Strengthening Safety Systems Through Shared Responsibility, Innovation, and Integration
Day 2 of AP-SAS 2025 focused on the critical need for clarity of roles, shared responsibility, and continued evolution of safety management across the aviation ecosystem. From safety management system integration and adaptive capacity to emerging cybersecurity threats and global navigation satellite system interference, speakers underscored the importance of data, technology, and collaboration in navigating today’s complexities. The message was clear: A resilient, forward-looking safety framework demands investment in people, innovation, and collective action.
Thanks to today's General Session sponsor!
Stakeholders across the aviation industry, including regulators, manufacturers, airlines, airports, and air navigation service providers, need to have a strong and clear vision of their roles within the aviation ecosystem and of their duties relative to safety, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Executive Director Florian Guillermet said Wednesday during his Day 2 keynote speech at AP-SAS 2025. As a regulatory authority, EASA must make difficult decisions that may not please the industry and that could have an impact on the financial aspects of the business, “but that is our duty,” he said.
Looking across the industry, Guillermet said that many authorities are struggling to maintain the proper level of human resources and other factors within their organisations because of financial constraints. “We need to explain to politicians that safety in the system doesn’t come for free,” and that investments must be made in people.
At EASA, a major challenge is the generational transition of the workforce. He said it is important to emphasise knowledge transfer from experienced personnel who are retiring to the younger generation of personnel being brought on board. “We have risk exposure that is growing” because the organisation may lose knowledge and competencies. “How to keep knowledge alive is a major challenge.”
At the same time, it is important for EASA and other organisations to equip themselves with new competencies. It’s not just about attracting the best people. EASA needs to equip itself with a much broader range of skills than in the past, he said.
“As an authority, we have a duty to stay on top of innovation and technology,” he said. “It impacts our daily lives and … we need to be ahead of the game enough” to understand where AI (artificial intelligence) is taking the industry and to create the proper regulatory framework.
To be effective in a complex operational environment, such as at an airport, a safety management system (SMS) must interface with all stakeholders, panelists said during a wide-ranging discussion on the SMS journey moderated by Bongi Mtlokwa, long-time chairperson of the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Safety Management Panel.
An SMS cannot operate in isolation, said Yeo Kia Thye, Managing Director, Airport Operations Control, Changi Airport Group. Rather, it must be designed to interface seamlessly. He said safety at an airport is a shared responsibility, and he went on to highlight some of the ways Changi is leveraging digitalisation to transform the management of safety.
Victor Tan, Director (Air Navigation Services Safety), Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, said there is a “triple convergence” of factors reshaping the air traffic control operational landscape: the rapid modernisation of air traffic management systems; the introduction of “new toys and technology” for air traffic controllers to use; and increases in traffic volume and complexity in the same airspace.
Cai Qi, Chief Flight Safety Officer, China Southern Airlines, said SMS must be optimised for maximum efficiency, that operations are getting more complex, and that SMS is expanding into more operations. He said safety and efficiency should coexist.
Benjamin 'Jay' R. Lopez, President, INAEC Aviation Corp., said that safety is not achieved in isolation, which is why his organisation shares lessons learned and collaborates with other stakeholders. “Every voice matters in preventing the next incident,” he said.
Akbar Sultan, Director Airspace Operations and Safety Program, U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), participating in the panel discussion remotely, talked about in-time aviation SMS (IASMS) and how transformation is needed to accommodate future operations. Those operations range from low-altitude small uncrewed aircraft systems and advanced air mobility to supersonic aircraft operating at Mach 1.5 and sharing the same higher altitudes (50,000 feet) with vehicles operating at just 15 knots.
The current method of relying on a human-centric approach for the provision of separation and safety services limits scalability, he said.
“We have to approach safety in a more prognostic and predictive way, using data and analytics,” he said. The old way of learning from accidents and incidents and then introducing new regulations and processing will not be sufficient, he said.
Creating adaptive capacity within a safety management system (SMS) involves developing capacities that help personnel anticipate and absorb pressures, variations, and disruptions, according to Peter Clemmow, General Manager of Group Safety and Operational Risk Management, Cathay Pacific Airways. Safety is our ability to adapt to and respond to our complex environment, our capacity to be successful in varying conditions, and our capacity to be safe no matter what is thrown at us, he said.
Safety culture depends on reporters coming to us with information, he said.
Clemmow said that Cathay is creating an integrated well-being system that will bring together work done in such areas as peer support so that this work can be managed within the system. “Human beings are the ones adapting and creating safety. We need to make sure they are thriving in the environment they are in,” he said.
Safety management continues evolve and must be fit for purpose, Bongi Mtlokwa, Chairperson of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Safety Management Panel and Aviation Safety Technical Officer, South Africa Civil Aviation Authority, said during a fireside chat on state safety programs (SSP) and national aviation safety plans (NASP) with Alan Foo, Deputy Director-General, Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore.
“We’ve come a long way,” Mtlokwa said in describing ICAO’s safety management journey. Amendment 2 to Annex 19 recently was adopted and the Safety Management Panel is already looking at Amendment 3. The panel is working on evolving risk management concepts. The current version has a simplistic approach and is no longer fit for purpose when it comes to the current complex operating environment, she said, adding that ICAO is looking integrated risk management.
In discussing Singapore’s SSP journey, Foo said a key moment was the realisation that the motivation to look at your risks comes from within and not because ICAO asks you to do that. He also talked about the need to bring nontraditional skill sets into safety, such as data collection and fusion. “We need people with the right kinds of skills and people who are used to dealing with large datasets.”

Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) interference in the form of spoofing and jamming is on the rise, and there is a correlation between these events and geopolitical conflicts, panelists said during a wide-ranging discussion of resilience by design.
Panel moderator Gian Andrea Bandieri, Section Manager–Cybersecurity in Aviation and Conflict Zones, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), explained that jamming blocks the GNSS signal, but spoofing is more subtle in that it sends false information to the receiver on board the aircraft.
Diego Albert, Director of APAC Sales, AIREON, said there were more than 12,000 events during a recent two-week period in which GPS signals were lost in the airspace near Myanmar. According to John Moore, Assistant Director–Flight and Technical Operations, Safety & Security, Asia-Pacific, International Air Transport Association, said that flights from Europe to Southeast Asia “are pretty much guaranteed” to lose GPS during flight, sometimes as many three times.
Panelists said that the GNSS interference in most cases is a side effect of electronic warfare near conflict zones and that civilian aviation is not the primary target.
The panelists agreed that the issue will eventually be resolved with technical solutions, but that the industry is not there yet. In the meantime, it is important to raise awareness of the issue. The avionics industry is working hard to provide the next generation of more resilient avionics systems, but for the next 18 to 24 months, the strategy is to mitigate the issue through containment.
Mitigating the risk of turbulence and other weather-related events requires a multi-faceted approach that includes technology, training, improved forecasting, and collaboration, according to panelists. In addition to enhanced data sharing, the increased use of aircraft as sensors, and improved reporting of turbulence are essential.
Capt. Ron Hay, President, International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA), said that weather is a contributing factor in about 30 percent of all aviation accidents and that knowledge is the key to avoiding turbulence. He said pilots must use all available tools to avoid problematic weather situations and that to avoid injuries, clear communication between the flight deck and cabin crew is critical. Almira Ramadani, Senior Air Traffic Representative for Asia-Pacific, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), talked about how FAA integrates information from a variety of
sources, including pilot reports, to inform stakeholders of weather risks. FAA holds eight webinars a day to keep users of the U.S. National Airspace System apprised of weather and other possible operational risks.
David Zwegers, Executive Director Global Safety Strategy, The Boeing Company, and moderator of the panel, said airliners are an accurate atmospheric sensing platform. He also said that collected data is used for ongoing research in the aviation and scientific communities.
Shane Ngai, Senior Manager, Safety, International Air Transport Association (IATA), discussed IATA’s Turbulence Aware initiative, which he described as a safety information exchange platform. He said it is a possible real-time information exchange solution.
Creating a balanced security ecosystem to mitigate growing cybersecurity threats requires aligning human and technological defenses, according to Stephen Creamer, President and CEO of the Air Traffic Control Association (ATCA), and former Director, Air Navigation Bureau, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
Creamer said four critical threat vectors impact aviation: data breaches, supply chain issues, system interconnection, and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) spoofing. Combating cyber threats requires around-the-clock monitoring, the use of AI-powered tools, and cross-border sharing of information, he said.
When it comes to creating a balanced security ecosystem, the human element requires a security awareness culture, role-specific training programs, regular threat briefings and updates, incident response team readiness, and cross functional collaboration, Creamer said. Technological elements include artificial intelligence (AI)-powered threat detection systems, multi-factor authentication, real-time monitoring dashboards, and predictive vulnerability analysis. “If you’re not using AI and machine learning, you’re behind the power curve,” he said.
Thank you to all our AP-SAS supporters